Science fair idea: Can a great nation survive while brain dead?










    How a volcano works

                                                                                                                                                          The time has been
                                                                          That, when the brains were out, the man would die,
                                                                          And there an end. But now they rise again
                                                                                                Macbeth, Act 3, Scene 4

Put away those baking soda and vinegar volcano demonstrations, kids.  There's a much better middle school science fair project to tackle this year.  It's basically a political science experiment, not physics, biology or chemistry, but prospective entrants should be able to convince their advisers that it is genuine research.  While the set up is bound to be very costly, students won't bear the expenses (at least not until much later in their lives) because wealthy campaign donors are putting up hundreds of millions in cash to put democracy to the test.  All you need to do is watch TV to see what the candidates, reporters and pundits are saying about the crucial issues facing America and notice what consequences flow from the torrent of stupidity.

Of course, any good science fair topic begins with a rigorous question.  In this instance the question might be:  Can a great nation survive while brain dead?

Evidence is already mounting to support a rigorously supported answer for the inquiry.  In months to come the data should be even more plentiful: -- factory closings, stock market crashes, rising unemployment, social safety nets torched, urgent problems left unaddressed, unrest in the streets, loss of national prestige, etc.  Tracking the collapse of the nation's sentience and decline in its nervous system functioning should be easily done. Fox News is especially good in reporting and amplifying the data, but the other networks are quickly gaining ground.

For young researchers looking for a quick start, here's a piece on "American Idiocracy" from the Economist.

Remember, kids, your project will also need a working hypothesis.  Which would you choose?

Pro-democracy leader Aung San Suu Kyi: BBC Reith Lectures


One of the most admirable political figures of our time, Aung San Suu Kyi, pro-democracy leader of Burma, has given two wonderful Reith Lectures on the BBC, one on "Liberty," another on "Dissent."  Both are available as podcasts for download.  Held under house arrest off-and-on for more than twenty years by the military junta that rules Burma, Suu Kyi was able to record the lectures and smuggle them to the UK for broadcast early this summer.  A telephone hook up also enabled her to field questions from an audience assembled in England. 

She speaks directly and eloquently about the meaning of freedom and the troubles that confront her quest to bring democracy to a land ruled by ruthless dictators.  Along the way she describes the circumstances of her imprisonment, sources of inspiration for resistance, what the term "activist" really means, the events of "Arab Spring," the barriers faced by members of her political party, and the promise of new communications media in worldwide struggles for liberation.  In one clear, no-nonsense passage, she puts her finger on the lure of "power" that entices people to abandon liberty and betray those who seek it. 

During the autumn of 1991 during a sabbatical in Norway, I went to the Oslo City city hall for the open-to-all ceremony awarding the Nobel Peace Prize to Aung San Suu Kyi.  She was under house arrest at the time.  Her husband, Michael Aris, accepted the award and her son, Alexander Aris, delivered a  moving speech on her behalf. 

If you have a chance, by all means listen to her gentle but insistent message in the Reith Lectures.


Job creation plans of both political parties: a detailed comparison


I've been reading in newspapers and on the Net to identify the key points in the job creation plans of the Democrats and Republicans.  In several days of searching, here's a point-by-point comparison of the ideas I've found.

Democratic Plan                                                 Republican Plan

1.  Extend unemployment insurance                          1.  Tax cuts for the wealthy
2.  Handshake and nice pat on the back                    2.  Handshake & hearty "Get a Job, Jerk!"
3.                                                                                         3.
4.                                                                                         4.
5.                                                                                         5.
6.                                                                                         6.
7.                                                                                         7.
8.                                                                                         8.
9.                                                                                         9.
10.  Obama's lecture fees when he leaves office       10.  Lecture fees for George W. Bush now
                                                                                                   that he's left office